Homepage vs Huly: which one to choose in 2026?
Both are open source alternatives to Notion. We compare license, tech stack and features to help you decide which fits your team best.
| Homepage | Huly | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Dev Tools | Productivity |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| GitHub stars | ~19.5k | ~11k |
| Tech stack | TypeScript, Next.js | Rust, React, MongoDB |
| Replaces | Notion | Linear, Notion, Slack |
Homepage has more GitHub stars, which usually indicates a larger community (not necessarily that it's the best option for your use case).
Homepage
Start page for your HomeLab with live status of your services.
Pros
- Very quick to set up as your browser's start page
- Huge and active integrations catalog
Things to consider
- Configuration is YAML-based, no visual editor
Huly
Projects + chat + docs in one, an alternative to Linear/Notion/Slack.
ℹ️ This single-container docker-compose doesn't match how Huly is actually deployed: the hardcoreeng/huly image doesn't exist, and the real project is ~10 independent microservices orchestrated by the official installer. Use huly-selfhost (github.com/hcengineering/huly-selfhost) for a deployment that actually works — we aren't rewriting that topology here without being able to verify it service by service.
Pros
- Replaces three different SaaS tools with a single deployment
Things to consider
- Young project, integration ecosystem still limited
- This catalog's docker-compose isn't deployable as-is (see note above) — use the official huly-selfhost installer
Key features
Homepage
- 100+ integrations with live status widgets
- Automatically detects Docker containers
- Fully configurable via YAML, no database
Huly
- Linear-style issues and projects
- Team chat and channels
- Collaborative documents
Already know which one you prefer?
Add it to your Stack Builder and generate a ready-to-deploy docker-compose.yml alongside the rest of your stack.
Go to Stack Builder