Authentik vs Logto: which one to choose in 2026?
Both are open source alternatives to Auth0. We compare license, tech stack and features to help you decide which fits your team best.
| Authentik | Logto | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Auth & Identity | Auth & Identity |
| License | MIT | MPL-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | ~25.3k | ~14.5k |
| Tech stack | Python, Go, PostgreSQL | Node.js, PostgreSQL |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | Auth0, Clerk |
Authentik has more GitHub stars, which usually indicates a larger community (not necessarily that it's the best option for your use case).
Authentik
Flexible identity platform, a modern alternative to Okta/Auth0.
Pros
- Visual authentication flow editor and an application proxy with no code changes
Things to consider
- Requires Postgres and Redis in addition to the server itself
Logto
Modern, easy-to-use identity, a self-hosted alternative to Clerk/Auth0.
Pros
- The closest experience to a polished SaaS product
Things to consider
- Smaller community than Keycloak or Authentik
Key features
Authentik
- Visual authentication flow editor
- Application proxy with no code changes
- MFA and conditional access policies
Logto
- Very polished admin console
- Multi-tenant and organizations included
- Social login and brand customization
Already know which one you prefer?
Add it to your Stack Builder and generate a ready-to-deploy docker-compose.yml alongside the rest of your stack.
Go to Stack Builder