Linkwarden vs wallabag: which one to choose in 2026?
Both are open source alternatives to Pocket. We compare license, tech stack and features to help you decide which fits your team best.
| Linkwarden | wallabag | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| GitHub stars | ~13k | ~10.8k |
| Tech stack | Next.js, PostgreSQL | PHP, Symfony, MySQL |
| Replaces | Pocket, Raindrop.io |
Linkwarden has more GitHub stars, which usually indicates a larger community (not necessarily that it's the best option for your use case).
Linkwarden
Bookmark manager with page archiving, an alternative to Raindrop.io.
Pros
- Archives a full copy of the page, not just the link
- Collections shared with other users
Things to consider
- AGPL-3.0: a strong copyleft license, with source-sharing obligations for covered modified versions and certain network use, under its terms
- Full page archiving uses significant storage
wallabag
Save articles to read later offline, an alternative to Pocket.
Pros
- Very permissive MIT license
- Mature project with over 10 years of active development
Things to consider
- Interface feels somewhat dated compared to newer alternatives
- Media archiving is more limited than Linkwarden's
Key features
Linkwarden
- Saves links plus screenshots and PDF archives of each page
- Organization via collaborative collections and tags
- Browser extension and mobile apps
wallabag
- Save articles to read later, offline
- Extracts clean content, no ads or distractions
- Text-to-speech and annotatable reading mode
Already know which one you prefer?
Add it to your Stack Builder and generate a ready-to-deploy docker-compose.yml alongside the rest of your stack.
Go to Stack Builder