Authentik vs SuperTokens: which one to choose in 2026?
Both are open source alternatives to Auth0. We compare license, tech stack and features to help you decide which fits your team best.
| Authentik | SuperTokens | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Auth & Identity | Auth & Identity |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| GitHub stars | ~25.3k | ~15.3k |
| Tech stack | Python, Go, PostgreSQL | Java, PostgreSQL |
| Replaces | Okta, Auth0 | Auth0, Clerk |
Authentik has more GitHub stars, which usually indicates a larger community (not necessarily that it's the best option for your use case).
Authentik
Flexible identity platform, a modern alternative to Okta/Auth0.
Pros
- Visual authentication flow editor and an application proxy with no code changes
Things to consider
- Requires Postgres and Redis in addition to the server itself
SuperTokens
Authentication with ready-to-integrate SDKs, an alternative to Auth0/Clerk.
Pros
- Very fast integration thanks to the SDKs
Things to consider
- Less flexible than Ory/Keycloak for very custom flows
Key features
Authentik
- Visual authentication flow editor
- Application proxy with no code changes
- MFA and conditional access policies
SuperTokens
- Official SDKs for React, Next.js, Node, Python...
- Secure session management by default
- Social and passwordless login included
Already know which one you prefer?
Add it to your Stack Builder and generate a ready-to-deploy docker-compose.yml alongside the rest of your stack.
Go to Stack Builder